Offensive Security

Your agents have credentials, tool access, and memory.
Threat actors are looking to exploit them.

Severity Zero is an offensive security firm. We attack AI agents, industrial control systems and embedded devices the way a real adversary would — and prove what actually breaks.

The problem

An agent is not an application.

It holds identity, reaches internal systems, acts without a human in the loop and holds sensitive context. The attack surface is not the model itself — it is the entire solution around it: the tools, the data, the identity and every system it can reach.

81%
Task-hijacking success observed in the wild
6 in 10
High-risk AI findings that are never remediated after disclosure
2.7×
AI and LLM testing surfaces high-risk findings at this rate against traditional software
INVISIBLE to Scanners and Standard PenTests

A vulnerability scanner never invokes a tool. A web application test scoped to the front end rarely reaches the agent sitting behind it. And testing a non-deterministic system once tells you about the attempt that failed — not the one that would have worked on the fourth try. Tooling and known playbooks alone will hand you a clean report and no assurance.

What we do

Map it. Attack it. Prove the controls hold. Keep watching.

Four steps, sold separately. Most engagements start at the map, because you cannot test what nobody has inventoried.

01 — MAP

AI Threat Mapping

What do we have, and where can it be attacked?
Inventory of agents, tools, MCP servers, identities and data flows. Trust boundaries made explicit and a threat model mapped to MITRE ATLAS and OWASP ASI.
02 — TEST

Agentic Testing

Can it actually be attacked?
Adversarial validation against the live system. Tool invocation abuse, memory and context poisoning, indirect injection, privilege escalation through tool chains.
03 — AUDIT

AI Security Audit

Do our controls and governance hold?
Guardrails, authorization model, logging and observability, model and tool supply chain — with evidence mapped to ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF.
04 — MONITOR

Continuous Exposure

Does it still hold next month?
The Severity Zero Threat Platform carries validated findings into continuous exposure monitoring. Inquire for details.
Capabilities

Systems that were never designed to be attacked.

AI and agentic systems are where we lead. The same adversarial discipline applies to the operational and embedded estate.

Primary focus

AI & Agentic Systems

Autonomous agents with real credentials and real tool access, and the infrastructure underneath them.

  • Agents, multi-agent chains and orchestration layers
  • MCP servers and third-party tool supply chain
  • LLM applications, RAG pipelines and retrieval surfaces
  • Agent identity, privilege and credential handling
  • Memory, context and persistence boundaries
  • Guardrail and authorization model validation
Operational

OT & ICS

  • PLC, SCADA and historian assessment
  • Segmentation and conduit validation
  • Safety-instrumented system review
Hardware

IoT & Embedded

  • Firmware extraction and analysis
  • Hardware interfaces and debug surfaces
  • Device-to-cloud and update channels
Regulated

Compliance-Driven Testing

  • PCI DSS 4.0.1 §11.4.6 segmentation testing
  • SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 27001 evidence
  • ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI RMF
Engagement

How it runs

Threat Mapping delivers in days. Full agentic testing runs two to four weeks, scaling with agent count and tool surface. We recommend staging or pre-production, and can test production under gated conditions.

Approach

Human-led. Validated. Reproducible.

Every finding we ship has been exploited, not flagged. If we could not prove it, it does not go in the report.

Repeated attempts, not single-pass

Agents are non-deterministic. We regression test to the point where the success rate stabilizes, rather than reporting whichever attempt happened to fail.

Per-task risk, not an aggregate score

Averages hide the one workflow that fails every time. Risk is reported against the task the agent actually performs.

Every untrusted input channel

Documents, email, calendar, tickets, retrieved web content — not just the prompt box. Instructions arrive wherever your agent reads.

Attack chains built for your architecture

Not a library of stock jailbreaks replayed against you. Known playbooks are the first thing your existing tooling already caught.

Who this is for

If any of these are true, there is something to test.

Scoped quote within 24 hours.

Send an architecture diagram and a list of tools. We will tell you what we would attack first, and what we have seen in the wild.

Start a scoping conversation hello@severityzero.com